| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | Leads this displayed comparison. Source notesSource cell: 96.91 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #2 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 0.44 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 96.47 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #3 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 0.57 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 96.34 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #4 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 1.16 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 95.75 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #5 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 1.69 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 95.22 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #6 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 1.98 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 94.93 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #7 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 2.73 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 94.18 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #8 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 2.91 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 94.00 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #9 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.01 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.90 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #10 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.17 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.74 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #11 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.21 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.70 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #12 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.58 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.33 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #13 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.61 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.30 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #14 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.65 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.26 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #15 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 3.87 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 93.04 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #16 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 4 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 92.91 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #17 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 4.29 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 92.62 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #18 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 6.14 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 90.77 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #19 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 6.24 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 90.67 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #20 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 6.66 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 90.25 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #21 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 6.96 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 89.95 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #22 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 7.13 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 89.78 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #23 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 7.41 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 89.50 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #24 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 8.31 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 88.60 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #25 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 8.34 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 88.57 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #26 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 10.32 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 86.59 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #27 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 10.39 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 86.52 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #28 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 10.44 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 86.47 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #29 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 11.17 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 85.74 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #30 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 11.25 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 85.66 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #31 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 12.38 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 84.53 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #32 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 13.15 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 83.76 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #33 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 13.3 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 83.61 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #34 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 13.54 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 83.37 |
|---|
| 1 report | OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score[1]OmniDocBench · end-to-end evaluation | #35 of 35 in this displayed comparison; 18.47 points below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 78.44 |
|---|