Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE

3.5 Sonnet

1 benchmarks · 6 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: 3.5 Sonnet; small dots: closest models where reported

826.2

3.5 Sonnet · SWE-Lancer · IC SWE (Diamond) · pass@1 · original evaluation ↗

5 more reported results

21.1% · 3.5 Sonnet · SWE-Lancer · IC SWE (Full) · pass@1 · original evaluation · SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? ↗

44.9% · 3.5 Sonnet · SWE-Lancer · SWE Manager (Diamond) · pass@1 · original evaluation · SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? ↗

47% · 3.5 Sonnet · SWE-Lancer · SWE Manager (Full) · pass@1 · original evaluation · SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? ↗

36.1% · 3.5 Sonnet · SWE-Lancer · SWE-Lancer Diamond · pass@1 · original evaluation · SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? ↗

33.7% · 3.5 Sonnet · SWE-Lancer · SWE-Lancer Full · pass@1 · original evaluation · SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

o1 →OpenAI
50.0 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

100.0 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn $1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering? — published result table ↗

    Miserendino, Samuel, Wang, Michele, Patwardhan, Tejal, Heidecke, Johannes · 2025

Names used in source tables

3.5 Sonnet