Spider 2.0 & BIRD-SQL ↗68.87%
ByteBrain ByteDance Infra Lab · Spider 2.0 & BIRD-SQL · test execution accuracy · main leaderboard ↗
ByteDance / MODEL EVIDENCE
ByteBrain ByteDance Infra Lab
1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources
Scores at a glance
1 benchmarks · large dot: ByteBrain ByteDance Infra Lab; small dots: closest models where reported
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs — published result table ↗
All 18 authors
Li, Jinyang, Hui, Binyuan, Qu, Ge, Yang, Jiaxi, Li, Binhua, Li, Bowen, Wang, Bailin, Qin, Bowen, Cao, Rongyu, Geng, Ruiying, Huo, Nan, Zhou, Xuanhe, Ma, Chenhao, Li, Guoliang, Chang, Kevin C. C., Huang, Fei, Cheng, Reynold, Li, Yongbin
Names used in source tables
ByteBrain ByteDance Infra Lab