Scores at a glance
1 benchmarks · large dot: ChatGLM3-6B; small dots: closest models where reported
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
8.3 percentile-point gap1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
16.7 percentile-point gap1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
25.0 percentile-point gap1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models — published result table ↗
Jiang, Yuxin, Wang, Yufei, Zeng, Xingshan, Zhong, Wanjun, Li, Liangyou, Mi, Fei et al. · 2023
All 10 authors
Jiang, Yuxin, Wang, Yufei, Zeng, Xingshan, Zhong, Wanjun, Li, Liangyou, Mi, Fei, Shang, Lifeng, Jiang, Xin, Liu, Qun, Wang, Wei
Names used in source tables
ChatGLM3-6B