ComplexBench ↗0.546%
ChatGLM3-6B-Chat · ComplexBench · DRFR · all constraints · RAL evaluation ↗
Z.ai / MODEL EVIDENCE
ChatGLM3-6B-Chat
1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources
Scores at a glance
1 benchmarks · large dot: ChatGLM3-6B-Chat; small dots: closest models where reported
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
Mistral-7B-Instruct →Mistral
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Composition — published result table ↗
All 14 authors
Bosi Wen, Pei Ke, Xiaotao Gu, Lindong Wu, Hao Huang, Jinfeng Zhou, Wenchuang Li, Binxin Hu, Wendy Gao, Jiaxin Xu, Yiming Liu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
Names used in source tables
ChatGLM3-6B-Chat