Claude · Do-Not-Answer & BeaverTails · human-rated safety · Original safeguard evaluation ↗
Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE
Claude
3 benchmarks · 12 observations · 3 sources
Scores at a glance
3 benchmarks · large dot: Claude; small dots: closest models where reported
claude · AlpacaEval · AlpacaEval 1 · GPT-4 judged win rate · original leaderboard example ↗
Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Biomedicine · MaHR · published main comparison ↗
9 more reported results
8.25% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Biomedicine · MiHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
39.11% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Finance · MaHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
10.56% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Finance · MiHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
21.31% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Science · MaHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
4.78% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Science · MiHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
41.26% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Education · MaHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
11.53% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Education · MiHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
55.39% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Open Domain · MaHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
19.5% · Claude · HaluEval 2.0 · Open Domain · MiHR · published main comparison · The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
There are not enough shared scored settings to identify close comparisons reliably.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models — published result table ↗
All 7 authors
Li, Junyi, Chen, Jie, Ren, Ruiyang, Cheng, Xiaoxue, Zhao, Wayne Xin, Nie, Jian-Yun, Wen, Ji-Rong
- Do-Not-Answer: Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs ↗
- AlpacaEval: An Automatic Evaluator of Instruction-following Models ↗
All 8 authors
Xuechen Li, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto
Names used in source tables
Claude · claude