Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024)

22 benchmarks · 23 observations · 22 sources · released 2024-10-22

Scores at a glance

22 benchmarks · large dot: Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024); small dots: closest models where reported

9.2896.4

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

3.2998.13

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · MATH level 5 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

3.768.3

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · Balrog · Average progress · % ↗

1274

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · CadEval · Overall pass (%) · % ↗

3286

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · GeoBench · ACW Country % · % ↗

026.5

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · GSO-Bench · Score OPT@1 · % ↗

29.587.3

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · MMLU · EM · % ↗

10.781.9

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % ↗

3091

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · VPCT · Correct · % ↗

41.6598.93

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · DTBench · Accuracy · % ↗

22.0882.35

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · LiveBench · Global average · % ↗

6079.7

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · VideoMME · Overall (no subtitles) · % ↗

0.3839.28

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · EnigmaEval · Accuracy · % ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

2.9 percentile-point gap

3 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons

Phi-4 →Microsoft
3.3 percentile-point gap

3 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons

3.4 percentile-point gap

4 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Aider LLM Leaderboards — Polyglot coding benchmark ↗

    Aider

  2. BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games ↗

    Paglieri, Davide, Cupiał, Bartłomiej, Coward, Samuel, Piterbarg, Ulyana, Wolczyk, Maciej, Khan, Akbir et al. · 2024

    All 13 authors

    Paglieri, Davide, Cupiał, Bartłomiej, Coward, Samuel, Piterbarg, Ulyana, Wolczyk, Maciej, Khan, Akbir, Pignatelli, Eduardo, Kuciński, Łukasz, Pinto, Lerrel, Fergus, Rob, Foerster, Jakob Nicolaus, Parker-Holder, Jack, Rocktäschel, Tim

  3. DTBench — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗

    Conceptual Reasoning Index

  4. Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) ↗

    Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models

  5. FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1, old) ↗

    Epoch AI

  6. FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v1, old) ↗

    Epoch AI

  7. GPQA Diamond ↗

    Epoch AI

  8. Humanity's Last Exam ↗

    Epoch AI

  9. MATH Level 5 ↗

    Epoch AI

  10. OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗

    Epoch AI

  11. SimpleBench ↗

    Epoch AI

  12. The Agent Company ↗

    Epoch AI

  13. Capabilities & benchmarking — retained external evaluation records ↗

    Epoch AI · 2026

  14. Video-MME ↗

    Epoch AI

  15. GeoBench — GeoGuessr model benchmark ↗

    GeoBench

  16. Writing benchmark — incorporating mandatory story elements ↗

    lechmazur

  17. GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents ↗

    Shetty, Manish, Jain, Naman, Liu, Jinjian, Kethanaboyina, Vijay, Sen, Koushik, Stoica, Ion · 2025

  18. WeirdML ↗

    Håvard Tveit Ihle

  19. EnigmaEval ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL

  20. LiveBench — model evaluation leaderboard ↗

    LiveBench Team

  21. Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks ↗

    METR

  22. CadEval Dashboard — run 20250422_095709 ↗

    willpatrick · 2025

Names used in source tables

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024)