Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE

Claude Code Agent + Sonnet Nodal Data

1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: Claude Code Agent + Sonnet Nodal Data; small dots: closest models where reported

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflows — published result table ↗

    Fangyu Lei, Jixuan Chen, Yuxiao Ye, Ruisheng Cao, Dongchan Shin, Hongjin Su et al. · 2024

    All 16 authors

    Fangyu Lei, Jixuan Chen, Yuxiao Ye, Ruisheng Cao, Dongchan Shin, Hongjin Su, Zhaoqing Suo, Hongcheng Gao, Wenjing Hu, Pengcheng Yin, Victor Zhong, Caiming Xiong, Ruoxi Sun, Qian Liu, Sida Wang, Tao Yu

Names used in source tables

Claude Code Agent + Sonnet Nodal Data