Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) · AA-AnalystAgent · strict score ↗
Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE
Claude Opus 4.7
61 benchmarks · 89 observations · 66 sources · released 2026-04-16
Scores at a glance
61 benchmarks · large dot: Claude Opus 4.7; small dots: closest models where reported
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) · ITBench-AA · root-cause score ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) · Terminal-Bench 2.1 ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) · Terminal-Bench Hard ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · GPQA Diamond · Accuracy ↗
2 more reported results
90.15% · Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · GPQA diamond ↗
86.36% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · GPQA diamond ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
1 more reported result
86.67% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · SWE-Bench verified · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
1 more reported result
82 % · Claude Opus 4.7 (Mini-SWE-agent) · SWE-bench Verified · Score · Vals AI · SWE-bench Verified ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · SimpleQA Verified · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
2 more reported results
36% · Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · Chess Puzzles ↗
26% · Claude Opus 4.7 (low) · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · Chess Puzzles ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · EBR-bench · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Mystery Game Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
1 more reported result
13% · Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · Mystery Game Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · Mystery Game Puzzles ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · MirrorCode · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · ARC-AGI · Score · % ↗
5 more reported results
92% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
91% · Claude Opus 4.7 (low) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
91% · Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
93.5% · Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
92% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · GSO-Bench · Score OPT@1 · % ↗
1 more reported result
44.12% · Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · GSO-Bench · Score OPT@1 · % · Epoch AI · GSO-Bench ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % ↗
2 more reported results
76.4% · Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · WeirdML ↗
75.45% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · WeirdML ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · APEX-Agents · Pass@1 score · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % ↗
5 more reported results
75.8% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
68.33% · Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
68.3% · Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
67.5% · Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
62.08% · Claude Opus 4.7 (low) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · PostTrainBench · Average (%) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · CritPt · Accuracy · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · ExploitBench · Mean capability · % ↗
1 more reported result
23.9% · Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · ExploitBench · Mean capability · % · Epoch AI · ExploitBench ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · OSWorld 2.0 · Binary accuracy · % ↗
1 more reported result
13.9% · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · OSWorld 2.0 · Binary accuracy · % · Epoch AI · OSWorld 2.0 ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · ProofBench · Accuracy · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · LMCA · Score · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · DTBench · Accuracy · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Furniture Assembly · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · GDP.pdf · GDP.pdf score · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · SciCode · Score · % ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · WebDev Arena · Elo ↗
1 more reported result
1555.22 Elo · Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · WebDev Arena · Elo · Epoch AI · WebDev Arena ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · General ECI · 26 October 2026 fit ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Compression · reference-anchored score ↗
3 more reported results
0.39 reference score · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · LM training · reference-anchored score · Vals RSI Index · LM training ↗
0.06 reference score · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Harness engineering · reference-anchored score · Vals RSI Index · Harness engineering ↗
0.00 reference score · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Post-training · reference-anchored score · Vals RSI Index · Post-training ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Vals Multimodal Index · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Legal Research Bench · All-Pass ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · LegalBench · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1 · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · CaseLaw · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Tax Agent Bench · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Finance Agent v2 · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Excel Modeling Benchmark v1 · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · CorpFin · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · MortgageTax · Accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
75.27 % · Claude Opus 4.7 · TaxEval · Accuracy · Vals AI · TaxEval ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · MedCode · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · MedScribe · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · AIME · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · MMLU Pro · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · MMMU Pro · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · SAGE · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 (OpenHands) · Vibe Code Bench · original task set ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · ProgramBench · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · Code Migration v1 · Accuracy ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · LiveCodeBench · Accuracy ↗
Opus-4.7 (Claude Code) · SWE Atlas - Refactoring · Score ↗
Opus 4.7 (Claude Code) · SWE Atlas - Test Writing · Score ↗
Opus 4.7 (Claude Code) · Scale Labs · Score ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark) · Score ↗
claude-opus-4-7 (max) · Scale Labs · Score ↗
Opus 4.7 (max) · TasteVal · Experimental compute multiplier · October 2026 paper comparison ↗
1 more reported result
0.75 × · Opus 4.7 (max) · TasteVal · Normalized final-performance multiplier · October 2026 paper comparison · TasteVal: Measuring the Experimental Research Taste of AI Systems Against Human Experts ↗
Claude Opus 4.7 · End-of-year balance ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
30 of 40 shared benchmark comparisons
38 of 40 shared benchmark comparisons
29 of 40 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- ARC Prize - Leaderboard ↗
- Arena leaderboard — WebDev evaluation ↗
- AA-AnalystAgent Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- ITBench-AA Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- SciCode Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- Terminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- Terminal-Bench Hard Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- TasteVal: Measuring the Experimental Research Taste of AI Systems Against Human Experts — published result table ↗
- DTBench — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗
- LMCA — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗
- APEX-Agents ↗
- ARC-AGI-1 ↗
- ARC-AGI-2 ↗
- Chess Puzzles ↗
- CritPt v1 ↗
- Earthborne Rangers (EBR-bench) ↗
- ExploitBench v0.1 ↗
- FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1, old) ↗
- FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) ↗
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v1, old) ↗
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) ↗
- Furniture Assembly Benchmark ↗
- GPQA Diamond ↗
- MirrorCode ↗
- Mystery Game Puzzles ↗
- OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗
- PostTrainBench v1.1 ↗
- SimpleQA Verified ↗
- SWE-bench Verified ↗
- Capabilities & benchmarking — retained external evaluation records ↗
- Vending Bench 2 — methodology and published results ↗
- AI benchmarks & capabilities ↗
- GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents ↗
- WeirdML ↗
- HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark) — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SWE Atlas - Refactoring — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SWE Atlas - Test Writing — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking computer-use agents on long-horizon real-world tasks ↗
- GDP.pdf Benchmark | Surge AI ↗
- AIME — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- CaseLaw — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Code Migration v1 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- CorpFin — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Excel Modeling Benchmark v1 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Finance Agent v2 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- GPQA Diamond — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- LiveCodeBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- LegalBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Legal Research Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MedCode — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MedScribe — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MMLU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MMMU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MortgageTax — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- ProgramBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- ProofBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vals RSI Index — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SAGE — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SWE-bench Verified — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Tax Agent Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- TaxEval — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vals Multimodal Index — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vibe Code Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
Names used in source tables
Claude Opus 4.7 · Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) · Claude Opus 4.7 (Mini-SWE-agent) · Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High) · Claude Opus 4.7 (OpenHands) · Claude Opus 4.7 (high) · Claude Opus 4.7 (low) · Claude Opus 4.7 (max) · Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) · Claude Opus 4.7 (no thinking) · Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) · Opus 4.7 (Claude Code) · Opus 4.7 (max) · Opus-4.7 (Claude Code) · claude-opus-4-7 (max)