RLTasksby ulam.ai
Models / Cohere

Cohere / MODEL EVIDENCE

Command A+

8 benchmarks · 8 observations · 8 sources · released 2026-05-20

Scores at a glance

8 benchmarks · large dot: Command A+; small dots: closest models where reported

SimoBench ↗4.437 / 7
3.175.97

Command-A-Plus · SimoBench · mean progress / 7 · As published ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

7.0 percentile-point gap

4 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Filter comparisons to this model →

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. CritPt v2 Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  2. SciCode Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  3. CritPt v1 ↗

    Epoch AI

  4. SimoBench | Ulam ↗

    Ulam

  5. Finance Agent v2 — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  6. LegalBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  7. MedCode — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  8. MedScribe — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

Names used in source tables

Command A+ · Command-A-Plus