Google / MODEL EVIDENCE

Gemini 1.5 Pro 08/27

1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: Gemini 1.5 Pro 08/27; small dots: closest models where reported

0.510.81

Gemini 1.5 Pro 08/27 · Michelangelo (Latent Structure Queries) · MRCR · cumulative mean through 128K · chart reading · Michelangelo original report · MRCR at 128K context ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

35.7 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries — published result table ↗

    Vodrahalli, Kiran, Ontanon, Santiago, Tripuraneni, Nilesh, Xu, Kelvin, Jain, Sanil, Shivanna, Rakesh et al. · 2024

    All 24 authors

    Vodrahalli, Kiran, Ontanon, Santiago, Tripuraneni, Nilesh, Xu, Kelvin, Jain, Sanil, Shivanna, Rakesh, Hui, Jeffrey, Dikkala, Nishanth, Kazemi, Mehran, Fatemi, Bahare, Anil, Rohan, Dyer, Ethan, Shakeri, Siamak, Vij, Roopali, Mehta, Harsh, Ramasesh, Vinay, Le, Quoc, Chi, Ed, Lu, Yifeng, Firat, Orhan, Lazaridou, Angeliki, Lespiau, Jean-Baptiste, Attaluri, Nithya, Olszewska, Kate

Names used in source tables

Gemini 1.5 Pro 08/27