Google / MODEL EVIDENCE

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25)

13 benchmarks · 28 observations · 14 sources

Scores at a glance

13 benchmarks · large dot: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25); small dots: closest models where reported

82.4982.49

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · LegalBench · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

82.63 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · LegalBench · Accuracy · Vals AI · LegalBench ↗

58.9758.97

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · CorpFin · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

59.75 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · CorpFin · Accuracy · Vals AI · CorpFin ↗

40.5440.54

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · MedCode · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

40.33 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · MedCode · Accuracy · Vals AI · MedCode ↗

77.9577.95

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · MedScribe · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

78.5 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · MedScribe · Accuracy · Vals AI · MedScribe ↗

91.4391.43

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · MedQA · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

91.17 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · MedQA · Accuracy · Vals AI · MedQA ↗

81.5781.57

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · GPQA Diamond · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

76.52 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · GPQA Diamond · Accuracy · Vals AI · GPQA Diamond ↗

83.6983.69

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · MMLU Pro · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

83.66 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · MMLU Pro · Accuracy · Vals AI · MMLU Pro ↗

79.4879.48

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · MMMU Pro · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

80.75 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · MMMU Pro · Accuracy · Vals AI · MMMU Pro ↗

75.0675.06

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · LiveCodeBench · Accuracy ↗

1 more reported result

76.21 % · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking) · LiveCodeBench · Accuracy · Vals AI · LiveCodeBench ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

There are not enough shared scored settings to identify close comparisons reliably.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. AIME — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  2. CorpFin — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  3. GPQA Diamond — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  4. LiveCodeBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  5. LegalBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  6. MedCode — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  7. MedQA — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  8. MedScribe — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  9. MGSM — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  10. MMLU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  11. MMMU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  12. MortgageTax — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  13. SAGE — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  14. TaxEval — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

Names used in source tables

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Nonthinking) · Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25) (Thinking)