Google / MODEL EVIDENCE

GeminiPro-Vision[41] (GeminiPro[41])

1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: GeminiPro-Vision[41] (GeminiPro[41]); small dots: closest models where reported

55.681.4

GeminiPro-Vision[41] (GeminiPro[41]) · AI2D (AI2 Diagrams) · AI2D accuracy · MMStar paper · visual-language model comparison ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models? — published result table ↗

    Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Zang, Zehui Chen et al. · 2024

    All 11 authors

    Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Zang, Zehui Chen, Haodong Duan, Jiaqi Wang, Yu Qiao, Dahua Lin, Feng Zhao

Names used in source tables

GeminiPro-Vision[41] (GeminiPro[41])