AgentBench & ToolBench ↗2.89 points
glm-4 / - · AgentBench & ToolBench · AgentBench overall · Original standard test set ↗
Z.ai / MODEL EVIDENCE
GLM-4 / -
2 benchmarks · 2 observations · 2 sources
Scores at a glance
2 benchmarks · large dot: GLM-4 / -; small dots: closest models where reported
ComplexBench ↗0.779%
GLM-4 · ComplexBench · DRFR · all constraints · RAL evaluation ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
There are not enough shared scored settings to identify close comparisons reliably.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents — published result table ↗
All 22 authors
Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chenhui Zhang, Sheng Shen, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su, Huan Sun, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
- Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Composition — published result table ↗
All 14 authors
Bosi Wen, Pei Ke, Xiaotao Gu, Lindong Wu, Hao Huang, Jinfeng Zhou, Wenchuang Li, Binxin Hu, Wendy Gao, Jiaxin Xu, Yiming Liu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
Names used in source tables
GLM-4 · glm-4 / -