NVIDIA / MODEL EVIDENCE

MT-NLG 530B

1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: MT-NLG 530B; small dots: closest models where reported

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

33.3 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

GPT-3 →OpenAI
33.3 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

66.7 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models ↗

    Hoffmann, Jordan, Borgeaud, Sebastian, Mensch, Arthur, Buchatskaya, Elena, Cai, Trevor, Rutherford, Eliza et al. · 2022

    All 22 authors

    Hoffmann, Jordan, Borgeaud, Sebastian, Mensch, Arthur, Buchatskaya, Elena, Cai, Trevor, Rutherford, Eliza, Casas, Diego de Las, Hendricks, Lisa Anne, Welbl, Johannes, Clark, Aidan, Hennigan, Tom, Noland, Eric, Millican, Katie, Driessche, George van den, Damoc, Bogdan, Guy, Aurelia, Osindero, Simon, Simonyan, Karen, Elsen, Erich, Rae, Jack W., Vinyals, Oriol, Sifre, Laurent

Names used in source tables

MT-NLG 530B