Qwen / MODEL EVIDENCE

Qwen2-72B

7 benchmarks · 8 observations · 7 sources · released 2024-06-07

Scores at a glance

7 benchmarks · large dot: Qwen2-72B; small dots: closest models where reported

9.2896.4

Qwen2-72B · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

3.2998.13

Qwen2-72B · MATH level 5 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

4.8 percentile-point gap

5 of 6 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) ↗

    Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models

  2. GPQA Diamond ↗

    Epoch AI

  3. MATH Level 5 ↗

    Epoch AI

  4. The Agent Company ↗

    Epoch AI

  5. AI benchmarks & capabilities ↗

    Epoch AI

  6. WeirdML ↗

    Håvard Tveit Ihle

  7. Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks ↗

    METR

Names used in source tables

Qwen2-72B