RLTasksby ulam.ai
Models / Reported model

Reported model / MODEL EVIDENCE

StarCoder2-15B

3 benchmarks · 3 observations · 2 sources

Scores at a glance

3 benchmarks · large dot: StarCoder2-15B; small dots: closest models where reported

HumanEval+ ↗37.8%
1.889

StarCoder2-15B · HumanEval+ · Pass@1 · EvalPlus · official result data ↗

HumanEval ↗46.3%
2.496.3

StarCoder2-15B · HumanEval · Pass@1 · EvalPlus · official result data ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

There are not enough shared scored settings to identify close comparisons reliably.

Filter comparisons to this model →

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions — published result table ↗

    Terry Yue Zhuo, Minh Chien Vu, Jenny Chim, Han Hu, Wenhao Yu, Ratnadira Widyasari et al. · 2024

    All 33 authors

    Terry Yue Zhuo, Minh Chien Vu, Jenny Chim, Han Hu, Wenhao Yu, Ratnadira Widyasari, Imam Nur Bani Yusuf, Haolan Zhan, Junda He, Indraneil Paul, Simon Brunner, Chen Gong, Thong Hoang, Armel Randy Zebaze, Xiaoheng Hong, Wen-Ding Li, Jean Kaddour, Ming Xu, Zhihan Zhang, Prateek Yadav, Naman Jain, Alex Gu, Zhoujun Cheng, Jiawei Liu, Qian Liu, Zijian Wang, Binyuan Hui, Niklas Muennighoff, David Lo, Daniel Fried, Xiaoning Du, Harm de Vries, Leandro Von Werra

  2. Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation — published result table ↗

    Liu, Jiawei, Xia, Chunqiu Steven, Wang, Yuyao, Zhang, Lingming · 2023

Names used in source tables

StarCoder2 / 15B · StarCoder2-15B