wizardlm-13b / v1.2 · AgentBench & ToolBench · AgentBench overall · Original standard test set ↗
Microsoft / MODEL EVIDENCE
wizardlm-13b / v1.2
2 benchmarks · 3 observations · 2 sources
Scores at a glance
2 benchmarks · large dot: wizardlm-13b / v1.2; small dots: closest models where reported
WizardLM-13B-V1.2 · FollowBench · Hard success rate · five-level average · English evaluation ↗
1 more reported result
60.7% · WizardLM-13B-V1.2 · FollowBench · Soft success rate · five-level average · English evaluation · FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
There are not enough shared scored settings to identify close comparisons reliably.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents — published result table ↗
All 22 authors
Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chenhui Zhang, Sheng Shen, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su, Huan Sun, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
- FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models — published result table ↗
All 10 authors
Jiang, Yuxin, Wang, Yufei, Zeng, Xingshan, Zhong, Wanjun, Li, Liangyou, Mi, Fei, Shang, Lifeng, Jiang, Xin, Liu, Qun, Wang, Wei
Names used in source tables
WizardLM-13B-V1.2 · wizardlm-13b / v1.2