Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620

7 benchmarks · 47 observations · 7 sources

Scores at a glance

7 benchmarks · large dot: claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620; small dots: closest models where reported

10611278

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · Chatbot Arena · Chatbot Arena Vision · English Elo · 2024-11-13 · November 13, 2024 snapshot ↗

8693

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · MMLU-Redux (2.0) · Virology · corrected-instance accuracy · MMLU-Redux 2.0 paper · audited subject comparison ↗

4 more reported results

96% · Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · MMLU-Redux (2.0) · Logical Fallacies · corrected-instance accuracy · MMLU-Redux 2.0 paper · audited subject comparison · Are We Done with MMLU? ↗

73% · Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · MMLU-Redux (2.0) · College Chemistry · corrected-instance accuracy · MMLU-Redux 2.0 paper · audited subject comparison · Are We Done with MMLU? ↗

77% · Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · MMLU-Redux (2.0) · Professional Law · corrected-instance accuracy · MMLU-Redux 2.0 paper · audited subject comparison · Are We Done with MMLU? ↗

98% · Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · MMLU-Redux (2.0) · Human Sexuality · corrected-instance accuracy · MMLU-Redux 2.0 paper · audited subject comparison · Are We Done with MMLU? ↗

070

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Public · FrontierMath public · 10 questions · source run score · Epoch AI · public February 2025 sample · historical release ↗

722

claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · 200-challenge full set ↗

6 more reported results

7.6923% · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · crypto subset · NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

20% · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · forensics subset · NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

16.6667% · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · misc subset · NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

17.9487% · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · pwn subset · NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

17.6471% · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · rev subset · NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

0% · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620 · NYU CTF Bench · pass@1 · web subset · NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

ForecastBench ↗63.1 Brier index
46.467

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620† · Overall difficulty-adjusted Brier index ↗

635

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · LitQA2 ↗

32 more reported results

2% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SuppQA · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

46% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · FigQA · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

83% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · TableQA · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

10.1% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench · DbQA · subtask macro average · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

48% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · ProtocolQA · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

51.5333% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench · SeqQA · subtask macro average · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

28% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · CloningScenarios · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

0% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_dga_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

0% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_gene_location_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

0% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_mirna_targets_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

55% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_mouse_tumor_gene_sets-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

14% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_oncogenic_signatures_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

0% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_tfbs_GTRD_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

2% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_variant_from_sequence_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

9% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_variant_multi_sequence_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

21% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_vax_response_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

0% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · DbQA_viral_ppi_task-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

7% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_ORF-seq-AAid-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

87% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_ORF-seq-AAseq-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

0% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_ORF-seq-numlen-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

87% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_ORF-transeff-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

57% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-gene-enzprimers-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

61% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-gene-gibshindprimers-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

65% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-gene-gibssmaprimers-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

73% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-geneprimers-enz-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

29% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-len-primers-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

35% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-primers-len-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

94% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-seq-enzprimers-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

97% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_PCR-seq-primers-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

59% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_Prop-seq-gcpercent-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

12% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_RE-seq-lenfrags-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

10% · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · LAB-Bench (v1) · Accuracy · SeqQA_RE-seq-numfrags-v1 · LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

There are not enough shared scored settings to identify close comparisons reliably.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Aider refactoring benchmark ↗

    Paul Gauthier, Aider contributors

  2. Are We Done with MMLU? — published result table ↗

    Gema, Aryo Pradipta, Leang, Joshua Ong Jun, Hong, Giwon, Devoto, Alessio, Mancino, Alberto Carlo Maria, Saxena, Rohit et al. · 2024

    All 16 authors

    Gema, Aryo Pradipta, Leang, Joshua Ong Jun, Hong, Giwon, Devoto, Alessio, Mancino, Alberto Carlo Maria, Saxena, Rohit, He, Xuanli, Zhao, Yu, Du, Xiaotang, Madani, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi, Barale, Claire, McHardy, Robert, Harris, Joshua, Kaddour, Jean, van Krieken, Emile, Minervini, Pasquale

  3. LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research — published result table ↗

    Jon M. Laurent, Joseph D. Janizek, Michael Ruzo, Michaela M. Hinks, Michael J. Hammerling, Siddharth Narayanan et al. · 2024

    All 9 authors

    Jon M. Laurent, Joseph D. Janizek, Michael Ruzo, Michaela M. Hinks, Michael J. Hammerling, Siddharth Narayanan, Manvitha Ponnapati, Andrew D. White, Samuel G. Rodriques

  4. Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models — published result table ↗

    Deitke, Matt, Clark, Christopher, Lee, Sangho, Tripathi, Rohun, Yang, Yue, Park, Jae Sung et al. · 2024

    All 50 authors

    Deitke, Matt, Clark, Christopher, Lee, Sangho, Tripathi, Rohun, Yang, Yue, Park, Jae Sung, Salehi, Mohammadreza, Muennighoff, Niklas, Lo, Kyle, Soldaini, Luca, Lu, Jiasen, Anderson, Taira, Bransom, Erin, Ehsani, Kiana, Ngo, Huong, Chen, YenSung, Patel, Ajay, Yatskar, Mark, Callison-Burch, Chris, Head, Andrew, Hendrix, Rose, Bastani, Favyen, VanderBilt, Eli, Lambert, Nathan, Chou, Yvonne, Chheda, Arnavi, Sparks, Jenna, Skjonsberg, Sam, Schmitz, Michael, Sarnat, Aaron, Bischoff, Byron, Walsh, Pete, Newell, Chris, Wolters, Piper, Gupta, Tanmay, Zeng, Kuo-Hao, Borchardt, Jon, Groeneveld, Dirk, Nam, Crystal, Lebrecht, Sophie, Wittlif, Caitlin, Schoenick, Carissa, Michel, Oscar, Krishna, Ranjay, Weihs, Luca, Smith, Noah A., Hajishirzi, Hannaneh, Girshick, Ross, Farhadi, Ali, Kembhavi, Aniruddha

  5. Forecastbench — methodology and published results ↗

    Epoch AI · 2026

  6. NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security — official leaderboard ↗

    Minghao Shao, Sofija Jancheska, Meet Udeshi, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Haoran Xi, Kimberly Milner et al. · 2024

    All 13 authors

    Minghao Shao, Sofija Jancheska, Meet Udeshi, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Haoran Xi, Kimberly Milner, Boyuan Chen, Max Yin, Siddharth Garg, Prashanth Krishnamurthy, Farshad Khorrami, Ramesh Karri, Muhammad Shafique

  7. A Rosetta Stone for AI Benchmarks — released Epoch evaluation runs ↗

    Epoch AI · 2025

Names used in source tables

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20240620) · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620 · claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620† · claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620