Google / MODEL EVIDENCE

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

55 benchmarks · 74 observations · 57 sources · released 2026-02-19

Scores at a glance

55 benchmarks · large dot: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview; small dots: closest models where reported

73.4787.69

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · MMMU-Pro · AA implementation ↗

75.5883.33

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · IFBench · AA implementation ↗

076

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

8.8977.4

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · MirrorCode · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

3.768.3

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Balrog · Average progress · % ↗

1 more reported result

56.9% · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Balrog · Average progress · % · Epoch AI · Balrog ↗

GSO ↗22.55%
9.888.24

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GSO-Bench · Score OPT@1 · % ↗

45.880.6

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % ↗

3.0784.72

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % ↗

4 more reported results

78.4% · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % · Epoch AI · Terminal Bench ↗

74.83% · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % · Epoch AI · Terminal Bench ↗

61.42% · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % · Epoch AI · Terminal Bench ↗

78.4% · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % · Epoch AI · Terminal Bench ↗

0.850.85

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GBAEval · Overall score · % ↗

032.29

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · CritPt · Accuracy · % ↗

11.427.9

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · CL-bench · Overall · % ↗

1717

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GDP.pdf · GDP.pdf score · % ↗

1.2766.9

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · SciCode · Score · % ↗

0.3839.28

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · EnigmaEval · Accuracy · % ↗

40.288.1

gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high) · Scale Labs · Score ↗

5.7874.39

gemini-3.1-pro-preview · Scale Labs · Risk elicitation score ↗

1.312.05

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (high) · Harmonic-mean speedup ↗

ForecastBench ↗64.3 Brier index
46.467

gemini-3.1-pro-preview† · Overall difficulty-adjusted Brier index ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

23.5 percentile-point gap

17 of 24 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Blueprint-Bench 2 | Andon Labs ↗

    Andon Labs

  2. ARC Prize - Leaderboard ↗

    ARC Prize Foundation

  3. Arena leaderboard — WebDev evaluation ↗

    Arena

  4. APEX-Agents-AA Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  5. EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  6. Global-MMLU-Lite Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  7. GPQA Diamond Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  8. Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  9. IFBench Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  10. MMMU-Pro Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  11. SciCode Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  12. 𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  13. Terminal-Bench Hard Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  14. OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoning — published result table ↗

    Opsahl-Ong, Krista, Singhvi, Arnav, Collins, Jasmine, Zhou, Ivan, Wang, Cindy, Baheti, Ashutosh et al. · 2026

    All 13 authors

    Opsahl-Ong, Krista, Singhvi, Arnav, Collins, Jasmine, Zhou, Ivan, Wang, Cindy, Baheti, Ashutosh, Oertell, Owen, Portes, Jacob, Havens, Sam, Elsen, Erich, Bendersky, Michael, Zaharia, Matei, Chen, Xing

  15. BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games ↗

    Paglieri, Davide, Cupiał, Bartłomiej, Coward, Samuel, Piterbarg, Ulyana, Wolczyk, Maciej, Khan, Akbir et al. · 2024

    All 13 authors

    Paglieri, Davide, Cupiał, Bartłomiej, Coward, Samuel, Piterbarg, Ulyana, Wolczyk, Maciej, Khan, Akbir, Pignatelli, Eduardo, Kuciński, Łukasz, Pinto, Lerrel, Fergus, Rob, Foerster, Jakob Nicolaus, Parker-Holder, Jack, Rocktäschel, Tim

  16. DTBench — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗

    Conceptual Reasoning Index

  17. LMCA — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗

    Conceptual Reasoning Index

  18. DeepSWE ↗

    Datacurve

  19. Algotune — methodology and published results ↗

    Epoch AI · 2026

  20. APEX-Agents ↗

    Epoch AI

  21. ARC-AGI-2 ↗

    Epoch AI

  22. Chess Puzzles ↗

    Epoch AI

  23. CL-bench ↗

    Epoch AI

  24. CL-bench Life ↗

    Epoch AI

  25. CritPt v1 ↗

    Epoch AI

  26. Earthborne Rangers (EBR-bench) ↗

    Epoch AI

  27. ExploitBench v0.1 ↗

    Epoch AI

  28. Forecastbench — methodology and published results ↗

    Epoch AI · 2026

  29. FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1, old) ↗

    Epoch AI

  30. FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) ↗

    Epoch AI

  31. FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v1, old) ↗

    Epoch AI

  32. FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) ↗

    Epoch AI

  33. Furniture Assembly Benchmark ↗

    Epoch AI

  34. GPQA Diamond ↗

    Epoch AI

  35. Humanity's Last Exam ↗

    Epoch AI

  36. MirrorCode ↗

    Epoch AI

  37. Mystery Game Puzzles ↗

    Epoch AI

  38. OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗

    Epoch AI

  39. PostTrainBench v1.1 ↗

    Epoch AI

  40. SimpleQA Verified ↗

    Epoch AI

  41. SWE-bench Verified ↗

    Epoch AI

  42. Terminal-Bench 2.0 ↗

    Epoch AI

  43. FutureSearch Evals ↗

    FutureSearch

  44. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview — GBA Eval ↗

    GBA Eval

  45. GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents ↗

    Shetty, Manish, Jain, Naman, Liu, Jinjian, Kethanaboyina, Vijay, Sen, Koushik, Stoica, Ion · 2025

  46. WeirdML ↗

    Håvard Tveit Ihle

  47. EnigmaEval ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL

  48. Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL · 2026

  49. Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL · 2026

  50. Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL · 2026

  51. Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL · 2026

  52. Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL · 2026

  53. AI Model Benchmarks — LM Council ↗

    LM Council

  54. Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks ↗

    METR

  55. GDP.pdf Benchmark | Surge AI ↗

    Surge AI

  56. Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard ↗

    Terminal-Bench Team

  57. ProofBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

Names used in source tables

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (high) · gemini-3.1-pro-preview · gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high) · gemini-3.1-pro-preview†