RLTasksby ulam.ai
Models / OpenAI

OpenAI / MODEL EVIDENCE

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

16 benchmarks · 20 observations · 16 sources

Scores at a glance

16 benchmarks · large dot: GPT-4o (2024-08-06); small dots: closest models where reported

MMLU-Pro ↗74.13 %
30.2892.38

GPT 4o (2024-08-06) · MMLU Pro · Accuracy ↗

MMMU-Pro ↗64.01 %
22.7790.64

GPT 4o (2024-08-06) · MMMU Pro · Accuracy ↗

SimpleQA ↗40.1%
7.662.5

gpt-4o-2024-08-06 · SimpleQA · Correct answers · OpenAI Simple Evals · archived July 2025 ↗

HumanEval ↗90.2%
71.599.3

gpt-4o-2024-08-06 · HumanEval · Pass@1 · OpenAI Simple Evals · archived July 2025 ↗

UGPhysics ↗39.29%
5.3657.16

GPT-4o-2024-08-06 · UGPhysics · English · overall accuracy · original evaluation ↗

2 more reported results

38.01% · GPT-4o-2024-08-06 · UGPhysics · Chinese · overall accuracy · original evaluation · UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models ↗

38.66% · GPT-4o-2024-08-06 · UGPhysics · Language average · overall accuracy · original evaluation · UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models ↗

Chatbot Arena ↗1131 Elo
10611278

GPT-4o-2024-08-06 · Chatbot Arena · Chatbot Arena Vision · English Elo · 2024-11-13 · November 13, 2024 snapshot ↗

FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Public ↗0%
070

gpt-4o-2024-08-06 · FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Public · FrontierMath public · 10 questions · source run score · Epoch AI · public February 2025 sample · historical release ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

11.1 percentile-point gap

7 of 9 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Filter comparisons to this model →

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Aider code editing benchmark ↗

    Paul Gauthier, Aider contributors

  2. Aider refactoring benchmark ↗

    Paul Gauthier, Aider contributors

  3. Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models — published result table ↗

    Deitke, Matt, Clark, Christopher, Lee, Sangho, Tripathi, Rohun, Yang, Yue, Park, Jae Sung et al. · 2024

    All 50 authors

    Deitke, Matt, Clark, Christopher, Lee, Sangho, Tripathi, Rohun, Yang, Yue, Park, Jae Sung, Salehi, Mohammadreza, Muennighoff, Niklas, Lo, Kyle, Soldaini, Luca, Lu, Jiasen, Anderson, Taira, Bransom, Erin, Ehsani, Kiana, Ngo, Huong, Chen, YenSung, Patel, Ajay, Yatskar, Mark, Callison-Burch, Chris, Head, Andrew, Hendrix, Rose, Bastani, Favyen, VanderBilt, Eli, Lambert, Nathan, Chou, Yvonne, Chheda, Arnavi, Sparks, Jenna, Skjonsberg, Sam, Schmitz, Michael, Sarnat, Aaron, Bischoff, Byron, Walsh, Pete, Newell, Chris, Wolters, Piper, Gupta, Tanmay, Zeng, Kuo-Hao, Borchardt, Jon, Groeneveld, Dirk, Nam, Crystal, Lebrecht, Sophie, Wittlif, Caitlin, Schoenick, Carissa, Michel, Oscar, Krishna, Ranjay, Weihs, Luca, Smith, Noah A., Hajishirzi, Hannaneh, Girshick, Ross, Farhadi, Ali, Kembhavi, Aniruddha

  4. UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models — published result table ↗

    Xin Xu, Qiyun Xu, Tong Xiao, Tianhao Chen, Yuchen Yan, Jiaxin Zhang et al. · 2025

    All 9 authors

    Xin Xu, Qiyun Xu, Tong Xiao, Tianhao Chen, Yuchen Yan, Jiaxin Zhang, Shizhe Diao, Can Yang, Yang Wang

  5. A Rosetta Stone for AI Benchmarks — released Epoch evaluation runs ↗

    Epoch AI · 2025

  6. Simple Evals — model benchmark results ↗

    OpenAI · 2025

  7. AIME — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  8. CorpFin — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  9. LegalBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  10. MATH 500 — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  11. MedQA — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  12. MGSM — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  13. MMLU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  14. MMMU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  15. MortgageTax — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

  16. TaxEval — evaluation methodology and results ↗

    Vals AI · 2026

Names used in source tables

GPT 4o (2024-08-06) · GPT-4o-2024-08-06 · gpt-4o-2024-08-06